Historical analysis in Winston Churchills speech

Historical analysis in Winston Churchill’s speechName


Historical analysis

Winston Churchill’s speeches are remembered not only for their oratory superiority but also for their effectiveness and capacity to elicit responses from the public and the general political space. An example of this is the famous Iron Curtain speech made on March 5th 1946, where he changed democratic Western perceptions of the Communist East regions of the Soviet Union. Churchill’s speech, entitled “The Sinews of Peace” was a unifying call for the British to be strategic and in their post war actions. This speech was effective in changing perceptions on communism because it comprised all the hallmarks of a convincing speech: ethos, pathos and logos.

His speeches provided the way forward for other countries such as Canada and the United States. In his speech on 5th march 1946, he stated that it would not be prudent for the United States, Britain and Canada to entrust the secretly held knowledge on the atomic bomb with other countries. This statement in his speech called for sensibility in the handling of nuclear power and its result reverberated decades later in the Cold War, where caution was exercised in handling nuclear weapons.

In addition, Churchill was very realistic in his speeches. He took a hard stance against Adolf Hitler’s encroachment into European countries. In 4th June, 1940, for example, he spoke in the House of Commons and declared that Britain was prepared to go on to the very end, specifically mentioning that the country was prepared to fight in France, oceans and seas and in the air to defend the country at all costs. This was effective because it gave confidence to British troops in the Second World War. His words reduced the sense of defeatism that was common in some European countries in the face of the adversity of war.