Creating a Proposal Using Work Groups

Creating a Proposal Using Work Groups

Name

Professor

Institution

Course

Date

Introduction

Creation of effective proposals through the involvement of the work groups depends on numerous sets of factors that influence the operationalization of the attempts. Typically, successful group proposal is achievable through proper setting of appropriate team, selection of the discussion sections, and well –defined selection of the audience, define checking of the goal, crafting of the instrumental agenda, establishment of the guiding questions and even outlining of the appropriate facilitators of the subsequent programs. The study on creation of the proposal of the workgroups is highly relevant and important or continued group and team work improvement in an organization growth thus facilitating the together improvement and growth of the organization. In any case, all members are involved and therefore least chances of errors are associated with the case. The topics outlined for coverage in this research will include the sub heading division of introduction, the project, analysis of the project, planning and solution, execution of the plan, evaluating of the results and the conclusion. The design and setting of the team enables a distinctive and well running of the workgroup, for instance the setting of 25 subjects or participants in the group and additional management committee that aids in the control and regulation of aiding activities of the proposal. The selective siting of the sections to be analyzed is awesomely important on enabling of excellent working sections of the work by the facilitator with less or much less confusion (Stolzenberg,1983). Clear rewards on the audience shall facilitate fine-tuned approach on the proposal completion and successful and viable competent results.The DAPEE Model

1191895725170Introduction

00Introduction

The project model shall cover majorly the following distinct parts

179324034925000

113919097790Project challenges

00Project challenges

1890395132080001074420358140Analysis of the proposal

00Analysis of the proposal

1793240415290001074420714375Planning ansolution00Planning ansolution

166433533845500

1139190251460Evaluation of the results

00Evaluation of the results

179324029781500

113919046355Conclusion

00Conclusion

The problems and challenges that are quite ritualistic with the projects are majorly financial generation and sources, the design of the proper work plan and the design of the workforces desirable for the proper running of the presented proposal after its initiation of implementation. The challenges are principally categorized into various distinct groups like for instance, technical, financial, human resource, environmental, institutional, legislative and political depending of the nature of the project proposed. The challenges are selectively tackled by the specialists groups thus fostering strong and timely results generation to the leader of the group at appropriate time, thus the main importance of the groups working the proposal design and generation (Macías, 2009).Analyzing the Project (SWOT analysis)

The proposal is vulnerable to various weaknesses, threats and also exhibits fine characteristics of opportunities and strengths to quicken simplest earning of the much desired destination. The weakness of the model is that multitude of people are involved. This inhibits quick reach for results as much disagreement is anticipated before eventual decision is reached. Furthermore, management of the groups is quite challenging and most participants in the have to be remunerated (Larsen, 2011). The groups own the responsibility in any case of failure of the projects proposal. Strengths of the framework lies in the stringent assessment of the ideologies presented and thus mostly the results are much likely to contain substantial chances of success as opposed to the normal or case of few participants in the proposal design. Opportunity available for exploitation by the group proposal generation is the extensive maximization of the talents of various participants and granting of every individual a chance to propagated gainful working of the group. The threats majorly arise from the financial application associated with the gainful activity of the proposal.Planning the Solution

Extensive planning and design of the work is important in identification of the structure of the challenge availed for processing purpose.

It also dictates time duration of the specified activity for processing by the implementers.

Executing the Plan

Taking an instance of the project work plan above, specification (wp1) succeeds full tests (wp6) and design procedures (wp5). Monitoring lab test and FE modeling are undertaken following some successive interrelated model. These interrelated tasks combine to actualize the training program (WP 7). The group should meet routinely after week duration and this should take course until the work is finally completed but essentially the timing is bound to change with the desires and plans of the group members. Punctuality will be of great importance to see to enable timely completion of the work within the stipulated time.Evaluating the Results

Evaluation and assessment of the proposal is undertaken after the implementation of the proposal under specified criteria. For instance , financial statement are analyzed by competent financial experts through means such as IRR,ARR, payback periods and many other model to assays the solvency of the business proposal. In case any eminent failure possibilities, the projects are intermittingly cut short to prevent any further loses to the stakeholder. The technical survival of the proposal is realizable through analysis of the graphical soften and analysis available in the field. This includes CAD, AchiCAD, inventor solid works and much other technical software (Larsen, 2011).

Likely obstacles

My group is most likely to experience poor communication skills between its members. For instance, the technical bench is likely to apply jargon during the process of the proposal design and this might hugely limit the effective communication of and successful completion of the work proposal within the specified period. The tendency to underestimate the contributions of other members during the group is most likely to degenerates the work of the group members. The social loafing of the group is most handled by creation of an organized leadership protocol whose main role will be to organize and facilitate smooth running of the group. Clear leadership will avail definite time to various participants to provide orderliness and ensure that nobody argues another person’s point while still at initial stage. Such analysis should be left for the subsequent stages of which every point shall be analyzed and desirable results presented to the boards. With clear rules set during the initiation of the groups work, the cohesion of the group is maintained the survival chances of the group is raised to satisfactory proportions(Stolzenberg,1983).Conclusion

As notable from the analysis; typically, successful group proposal is achievable through proper setting of appropriate team, selection of the discussion sections, and well –defined selection of the audience, define checking of the goal, crafting of the instrumental agenda, establishment of the guiding questions and even outlining of the appropriate facilitators of the subsequent programs. Moreover, other minor factors contribute to successful creation of the work group for the creation of the proposals. This include clear recognition of the problems, project analysis etc.

Reference

Stolzenberg, J., Wisconsin., & Wisconsin. (1983). Legislation relating to economic development. Madison: Wisconsin Legislative Council.

Larsen, M. (2011). How to write a book proposal. Cincinnati, OH: Writer’s DIgest Books.

Macías, J. A., Granollers, T., & Latorre, A. P. (2009). New trends on human-computer interaction: Research, development, new tools and methods. London: Springer.