The Diet and Physical Activity Patterns among Preagricultural Hunters and Gathers (Foragers) and Contemporary Lifestyles
Preagricultural humans led nomadic lifestyles, composed majorly of hunting and gathering to ensure sustenance. Agriculture eliminated the need for humans to forage for food. Now contemporary lifestyles are very different from the preagricultural period. The diet and physical activities of preagricultural humans compared to contemporary lifestyles differ in terms of quality, quantity, and frequency, factors which have led to major transitions in disease among humans.
The quantity of diet and physical activity patterns between contemporary and preagricultural humans are distinct. Firstly, the nutrition of preagricultural humans is largely speculative but reliable research issues that it was considerably reduced compared to the contemporary humans. In contrast, the modern human take sin a lot of nutrition, while not necessarily in the right portions, but the diet is more and richer. Secondly, the quantity of physical exercise for preagricultural humans is significantly higher because they had to hunt and gather food on a daily basis. Their physical activity patterns were not out of leisure but because of a need to do the same. Preagricultural humans did not have conventional conveniences such as stores and livestock. Contemporary humans had significantly reduced physical activity patterns on the basis of quantity. Their lifestyles have been affected by the availability of food and resources without the need to even go out to get the same. Therefore, the quantity of diet and physical exercise are different because of the availability of resources and the technology to store the same.
Likewise, the quality of diet and physical activity patterns between contemporary and preagricultural humans are also distinct. Today, contemporary humans have the ability to choose what to consume based on technological advancements. This means that if one’s diet is lacking in protein, it would be very easy to get supplements that are protein rich, thus improving quality. For preagricultural humans, quality of diet was largely emphasized because they fed on similar diets involving foraged foods and hunted meats. Physical exercise is largely the same in terms of quality, although modern equipment allows people to focus on the type of physical exercises that matter or apply to them. Here, quality is relatively similar.
Frequency of diet and physical exercise for preagricultural humans and contemporary lifestyles are different. Food and diet are available to contemporary humans more compared to preagricultural humans. Physical exercise also is available, despite not being used as expected for contemporary humans. The relationship between these patterns and the major transitions in patterns of disease among humans has led to the increase of diseases. However, modern advancement sin medicine have enabled contemporary humans to combat the diseases and attain better health compared to preagricultural humans.
In conclusion, it is clear that diet and physical activities of preagricultural humans compared to contemporary lifestyles differ in terms of quality, quantity, and frequency, factors which have led to major transitions in disease among humans. The quantity of diet and physical activity patterns between contemporary and preagricultural humans are distinct. Similarly, the quality of diet and physical activity patterns between contemporary and preagricultural humans are also distinct. Combined, the frequency of diet and exercise have led to more diseases for the modern human.
