Student’s Name
Professor’s Name
Course
Date
Annotated Bibliography on Gentrification
Abstract
This literature review implicates review and discussion of the gentrification process a whole. It presents the effects of gentrification both the positive as well as the negative ones but mainly centers on the adverse impacts of gentrification which regarded as the primary study of interest. The reason is that Gentrification in many instances has been considered as the source of sharp conflict in several American municipalities. Locality change is regularly observed as the cause-effect of social injustices whereby the wealthy who are commonly white is acknowledged for enlightening a locality whose poor marginal inhabitants are evacuated by amplified rents as well as the economic change.
Paton, Kirsteen. Gentrification: A working-class perspective. Routledge, 2016.
This book by Paton and Kirsteen explores the experience of the working class. The book re-examines the long-term relationship between the urban as well as the class in the society. In the urban areas, the social class is clearly articulated ranging from the housing predicament to the recreation of the housing states. The book further suggests that gentrification is usually presented to a suitable and also a market remedy to such urban problems and thus intensely institutionalized as redevelopment and hence directed at the regions which have at least suffered from disinvestment or they are characterized by lack of something substantial. According to this book, gentrification is no longer a peripheral neighborhood process as it is a policy which is widespread every day. Social disparities, economic crisis, crime as well as development is extensively discussed in this book.
Smith, Neil. "Is gentrification a dirty word." Smith, Neil. The New Urban Frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City. London and New York: Routledge (1996).
According to this book, the author’s contests conservative wisdom, which considers gentrification to be the simple consequence of new middle-class perceptions plus a demand for urban living. The book further exposes gentrification as a part of a more significant change in the political economy as well as the philosophy of the late 20th century. The author discovers the interconnections of urban strategy, investment patterns, eviction, homelessness, and social conflicts. The failure of the abundant urban plan besides the culmination of financial prosperous at the end of the 1980s has resulted at the end of the century city to be a darker and a more risky place. The private sector, as well as the public policy, are collaborating against the minorities, the poor, the working individuals alongside the homeless as it has never been experienced before. Therefore as the book suggests, in the developing revanchist city, gentrification has developed to be a part of this strategy revenge.
Zuk, Miriam, et al. "Gentrification, displacement and the role of public investment: a literature review." Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. Vol. 79. 2015.
The article discourses that there has been scholarly awareness in the connection amid investment as well as displacement which dates back in the 1970’s. Thus this is the repercussion of displacement which is associated with the urban regeneration. In contemporary times, there has been a new wave of study which involves examining the gentrification process mainly in sturdy market metropolises plus its association to public investment, predominantly in transit. Therefore the effects of these studies are varied, as a result of methodological limitations. Thus this article suggests that a significant finding observing across the literature is that there exists the necessity for a new-fangled methodology to examine the displacement risk.
Shaw, Kate S., and Iris W. Hagemans. “‘Gentrification Without Displacement’and the Consequent Loss of Place: The Effects of Class Transition on Low‐income Residents of Secure Housing in Gentrifying Areas.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 39.2 (2015): 323-341.
According to this article, there is a progressively dubious idea of gentrification-prompted displacement which is uniting with the dispute that the underprivileged get a lot of benefits from social mix to produce an ideal situation aimed at constructive gentrification. The idea that the innovative middle-class inhabitants not only offers more investment but also tend to carry more opportunities for the increasing social flexibility to the low-income individuals who succeed to live in gentrifying parts has resulted in becoming policy convention.
This article further suggests that whereas there exist some intellectual encounters to the degree of these welfares, the shortcomings of the enforced social mix on the underprivileged societies even at the instances where they are not evacuated tend to continue being under-researched. Hence this article assists in sealing this gap by reporting on the study into the experience of long-term as well as low-income inhabitants of gentrifying localities who succeeded to stay positioned.
Bibliography
Paton, Kirsteen. Gentrification: A working-class perspective. Routledge, 2016.
Shaw, Kate S., and Iris W. Hagemans. “‘Gentrification Without Displacement’and the Consequent Loss of Place: The Effects of Class Transition on Low‐income Residents of Secure Housing in Gentrifying Areas.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 39.2 (2015): 323-341.
Smith, Neil. "Is gentrification a dirty word." Smith, Neil. The New Urban Frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City. London and New York: Routledge (1996).
Smith, Neil. "Is gentrification a dirty word." Smith, Neil. The New Urban Frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City. London and New York: Routledge (1996).
Zuk, Miriam, et al. "Gentrification, displacement and the role of public investment: a literature review." Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. Vol. 79. 2015.
